Bibhuprasad Biswal:Aesthete

Bibhuprasad Biswal:Aesthete

Aesthetica

  • Latest
  • Popular
  • Video
#Consciousness #Spirituality #Inspiration #revelations #Aesthetics #literature #write, #create, #literature, #general, #aesthetics, #life, #muses, #philosophy, #religion, #reflection, #art, #ethics, #evolution, #knowledge, #wisdom, #mystic,#thought,#inspiration, #truth, #spirituality, #revelations, #ancient, #elemental, #cosmic, #consciousness. ©Bibhuprasad Biswal:Aesthete

Art and Criticism

81 View

#Quotes Hell and Heaven ©Bibhuprasad Biswal:Aesthete

Hell and Heaven ©Bibhuprasad Biswal:Aesthete

72 View

Shakespeare, in his tragic play King Lear, dwells on the theme of a timeless dilemma: whether a woman should prioritize her love for her father or her husband. The play seems to suggest that the woman should have greater love for her husband, as exemplified by the character of Cordelia, the daughter in the play. Not withstanding the play, the dilemma continues to the present day with its aggressive horns pointing at the concerned. The debate continues, with some supporting the father for his selfless love, which does not need to be expressed on a moonlit night or in the flickering light of candles on a dark night. Some say the husband is a true mate for the woman because he shares everything with her and remains a companion till the end. How would you feel comparing a polar bear with a camel? The comparison between the father and the husband is as absurd. The father loves the daughter the way no one else can love her in the world: it’s angelic, and the husband is the true mate of a woman; he sails through the turbulences of life and shares everything with her. Thus, the father and husband debate is is an absurd one. The love for them cannot be compared. The father reaches a state of divinity in his love for the daughter, so he is loved like a divine being,while the husband is the earthly mate and is loved as such. Truly, the love for them can’t be compared. ©Bibhuprasad Biswal:Aesthete

Shakespeare, in his tragic play King Lear, dwells on the theme of a timeless dilemma: whether a woman should prioritize her love for her father or her husband. The play seems to suggest that the woman should have greater love for her husband, as exemplified by the character of Cordelia, the daughter in the play. Not withstanding the play, the dilemma continues to the present day with its aggressive horns pointing at the concerned. The debate continues, with some supporting the father for his selfless love, which does not need to be expressed on a moonlit night or in the flickering light of candles on a dark night. Some say the husband is a true mate for the woman because he shares everything with her and remains a companion till the end. How would you feel comparing a polar bear with a camel? The comparison between the father and the husband is as absurd. The father loves the daughter the way no one else can love her in the world: it’s angelic, and the husband is the true mate of a woman; he sails through the turbulences of life and shares everything with her. Thus, the father and husband debate is is an absurd one. The love for them cannot be compared. The father reaches a state of divinity in his love for the daughter, so he is loved like a divine being,while the husband is the earthly mate and is loved as such. Truly, the love for them can’t be compared. ©Bibhuprasad Biswal:Aesthete

72 View

#KhoyaMan Art is valuable because it can contain the highest and subtlest level of human thoughts. This is why art is timeless. Art is not simply about creating something beautiful or aesthetically pleasing. It is about expressing something that is deeper and more meaningful than words can say. It is about capturing a moment in time, a feeling, or a thought in a way that can be shared with others. Art is timeless because it transcends time and place. A great work of art can speak to people from all walks of life, regardless of when or where they live. It can evoke emotions and insights that are universal and timeless. Often, people mistakenly believe that art must be derived from the attributes of the past in order to be considered artistic. However, this is not the case. Art can be anything that is creative and expressive, regardless of its style or form. A work of art can be modern, contemporary, or even abstract, and still be considered artistic if it communicates something of value to the viewer. Ultimately, the value of art lies in its ability to touch our hearts and minds. It can make us think, feel, and see the world in new ways. It can connect us with others and with our own humanity. For these reasons, art is a valuable and essential part of our lives. ©Bibhuprasad Biswal:Aesthete

#KhoyaMan UnHeardकवि @Bhagyashree Jena @indefinite_mirage

237 View

#humantouch Is it possible to know everything? In his essay " An Educated person" Harold Nicholson asserts that no one can know everything and it's also not possible to know "everything about something and something about everything". Thus it seems that, it isn't possible to know everything. Great philosophers and Scientists always proclaimed that they are ignorant and that, what they knew was a drop of water with a sea of knowledge way beyond them. However, some people, a few thousand years back, seemed to know everything about the universe. They never claimed that they knew everything but what they have revealed to the world,  with what depth, is proof enough to prove this. They were able to see the future and narrate so with details. They were able to know the nature of the things around them and what they said stood the test of time. What was the source of their knowledge? They didn't seem to have any. They had no access to any equipment or technology. The source of their knowledge was internal, pure knowledge flowed from their heart and mind. ©Bibhuprasad Biswal:Aesthete

#humantouch

354 View

Trending Topic